<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anchor links: do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webusability-blog.com/anchor-links-dos-and-donts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webusability-blog.com/anchor-links-dos-and-donts/</link>
	<description>Tips, insights and meandering thoughts about usability and information architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:34:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Els Aerts</title>
		<link>http://webusability-blog.com/anchor-links-dos-and-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-13902</link>
		<dc:creator>Els Aerts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webusability-blog.com/?p=207#comment-13902</guid>
		<description>Glad you like it.

The strange thing about the Jakob Nielsen article is that everybody seems to miss his section on &#039;When Within-Page Links Are OK&#039;. 

He says quite clearly there that in-page links work fine if you use them as a kind of index at the top of a page...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like it.</p>
<p>The strange thing about the Jakob Nielsen article is that everybody seems to miss his section on &#8216;When Within-Page Links Are OK&#8217;. </p>
<p>He says quite clearly there that in-page links work fine if you use them as a kind of index at the top of a page&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://webusability-blog.com/anchor-links-dos-and-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-13847</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webusability-blog.com/?p=207#comment-13847</guid>
		<description>This is a great article! I always considered that anchor links in a table of contents are really useful to people, but reading Jacob Nielsen&#039;s article (on Avoid Within-Page Links - &lt;code&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/within_page_links.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/within_page_links.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/code&gt;) and have colleagues quote it back at me lead to a stalemate. Its great there&#039;s evidence from testing that shows that anchor links are useful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article! I always considered that anchor links in a table of contents are really useful to people, but reading Jacob Nielsen&#8217;s article (on Avoid Within-Page Links &#8211; <code><a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/within_page_links.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/alertbox/within_page_links.html</a></code>) and have colleagues quote it back at me lead to a stalemate. Its great there&#8217;s evidence from testing that shows that anchor links are useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaira</title>
		<link>http://webusability-blog.com/anchor-links-dos-and-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-9472</link>
		<dc:creator>zaira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webusability-blog.com/?p=207#comment-9472</guid>
		<description>great list of dos and don&#039;ts..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great list of dos and don&#8217;ts..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

