<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No such thing as bad publicity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/</link>
	<description>Tips, insights and meandering thoughts about usability and information architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:34:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Els Aerts</title>
		<link>http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Els Aerts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webusability-blog.com/?p=388#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your input, Sebastian.

1) I totally agree with you on this one.

2) Again, I agree. But with a little reservation. Free speech can&#039;t be oppressed online, that&#039;s true. But do you really have to show every negative comment people make about you? What if somebody who hasn&#039;t seen that terrible ad visits the site of Citroen and sees those Twitter comments? Could that really be a good thing? I honestly don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your input, Sebastian.</p>
<p>1) I totally agree with you on this one.</p>
<p>2) Again, I agree. But with a little reservation. Free speech can&#8217;t be oppressed online, that&#8217;s true. But do you really have to show every negative comment people make about you? What if somebody who hasn&#8217;t seen that terrible ad visits the site of Citroen and sees those Twitter comments? Could that really be a good thing? I honestly don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Preuss</title>
		<link>http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Preuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webusability-blog.com/?p=388#comment-856</guid>
		<description>Nice article and good questions. Here are my two cents: 

1) No, advertisers come to your site because you offer a specific audience. If you annoy this audience by bad ads, they might stay away - and thus keep advertisers away. There is an interdependency between content, visits and ad revenue. 

2) Yes, unless they are offending below the belt. You always have a chance to respond, and discussions that evolve give you a chance to your strenghts. Anyway, if you gag people on your site, they will speak out somewhere else - freedom of speech cannot be oppressed online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article and good questions. Here are my two cents: </p>
<p>1) No, advertisers come to your site because you offer a specific audience. If you annoy this audience by bad ads, they might stay away &#8211; and thus keep advertisers away. There is an interdependency between content, visits and ad revenue. </p>
<p>2) Yes, unless they are offending below the belt. You always have a chance to respond, and discussions that evolve give you a chance to your strenghts. Anyway, if you gag people on your site, they will speak out somewhere else &#8211; freedom of speech cannot be oppressed online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

