<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Web Usability Blog&#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webusability-blog.com/tags/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webusability-blog.com</link>
	<description>Tips, insights and meandering thoughts about usability and information architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:47:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No such thing as bad publicity?</title>
		<link>http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/</link>
		<comments>http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Els Aerts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webusability-blog.com/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there really no such thing as bad publicity? What about somebody else's bad publicity shown on your website? Check out the example from Citroen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as bad publicity. At least, that&#8217;s what they say. But is it true? And is it also true for the website that&#8217;s showing the &#8216;bad publicity&#8217;?</p>
<h1>Question 1</h1>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><strong>If your income is largely determined by advertising revenue, should you simply accept an ad that ruins your website&#8217;s layout? Grin and bear it?</strong></p>
<p>Citroen (the car manufacturer who accused me of a <a href="http://webusability-blog.com/gender-error/">gender error</a>) celebrated their 90th anniversary this week. They celebrated with an ad. I prefer cake, but there you go. The Citroen birthday ad considerably slowed down the loading time of my newspaper&#8217;s homepage. For about 30 seconds, all I saw was this:</p>
<p> <img title="Citroen ad on the site of Belgian newspaper De Standaard" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/3906991582_e991ec13f0.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="389" /></p>
<p><span id="more-388"></span>Twitter was awash with tweets about the ad. Some people found the ad in itself annoying. Others pointed out that it totally screwed up the newspaper site&#8217;s layout. Both were legitimate complaints.</p>
<h1>Question 2</h1>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><strong>Should you show the tweets about your site on your site? </strong></p>
<p>A lot of companies show the tweets that mention their name on their website. Sometimes those tweets are positive. Sometimes they&#8217;re not. And sometimes they&#8217;re really really not.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t look at the screenshot below if you&#8217;re of a sensitive disposition.</p>
<h1><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3502/3906894593_bea5406c7f_o.gif" rel="lightbox[388]"><img class="alignnone" title="Tweets on the Citroen ad" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3502/3906894593_bea5406c7f_o.gif" alt="" width="498" height="237" /></a><strong></strong></h1>
<h1>Question 3</h1>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><strong>What do you think?</strong></p>
<p>Is there no such thing as bad publicity?<br />
Does it harm your brand if you show negative feedback on your own site?<br />
Or does it show that you&#8217;re honest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webusability-blog.com/no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

